Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Soruces

This source gave me good information on the on the different specific examples of different museums that are facing problems with repartition.
This shows that the repartition movement is unfair and protest against it.


This source is against to pro-reparation, and about the SAA, and AAA.
This source is focused on the legality of Repartition.
This gives more info about Berkeley's findings in 1974.
This source gives info about the indians that were found underneath the gymnasium at Berkeley

The Indian Bone Wars Essay

Jake Teachey
October 28, 2014
In Class Essay
Repartition
I pledge



                                                            The Indian Bone Wars

For many years there have been ongoing debates on whether or not is morally correct for museums to be able to dig up, and display, Native American skeletons and remains. There have been many different cases where Native American skeletons have been found, and then put on display for everyone to see. The act of showing the Native American ancestral skeletons is just plain wrong, and unfair. It is against all moral laws, and is extremely insulting, and disrespectful to the Native Americans to display their ancestors in such a way that the whole world can see.
            There are many groups that are pro-repartition such as the Society of American Archeology, and American Anthropologist Association. These two groups argue that with the technology we have in present day unlocks a whole new level of research, and scientific endeavors.  They say that if we study these bones then we will be able to know much more about dieses and the undocumented past of the Native American lifestyle. On the contrary a modern day Native American, Carl Bryant Rogers brings up a very true point. “Why single out the Indians, why not dig up everyone else’s ancestors” this statement brings up a great point in which why do the bones on display have to be from the Native Americans. Why not just go to a cemetery and dig up other skeletons? The main reason they are choosing to use Native Americans is because there is a hint of racism in there.
            As previously stated there is Racism all through out the Repartition Act, and the “Indian Bone Wars”.  The Pawnee Burial pits in Salina Kansas show the Racism in all of this. These Burial Pits were finally covered in 2010 largely thanks to Walter Hawk who is a Pawnee himself and a leading lobbyist for repartition movement. He also brings up a very sad but true statement. He states “if you desecrate a white grave you go to jail for 10 years, but if you desecrate a Indian grave you earn your self a P.H.D.” This shows the underlying tone of Racism, because even though the Indian bones and skeletons may be old they are still no different from any other skeleton, so why is it just the Indians which are being dug up? The way Hawk looks at it is it should not be difficult to understand that their Ancestors should rest in peace, and that scientist should respect there religious beliefs of life after death. The Native Americans feel as if it unfair that they are being singled out. For example, remains of hundreds of thousands of Indians lay in drawers and on shelf’s in museums. The Smithsonian alone had an estimated 19,000 Native Americans skeletons in their museums.
            One final example of why the bones should all be returned and reburied properly is the Dickson Mounds in Southern Illinois. Many Native Americans protest on a daily basis that the museum should be shut down, and that their ancestors should be able to rest in peace. The museum states they should not have to close down because never have they made the bones a “sideshow” or a “carnival act”, and have never made any profit off of showing the bones, they are just their to enrich the tourist with ancient artifacts of the surrounding area. The Museum says that the skeletal remains are over 900 years old, and cannot be traced in anyway to a specific tribe. The Native Americans did not take that statement lightly, and they feel as if they need to respect any ancestral remains of whatever tribe the skeletons belong too no matter how old. The Indians are destined to wander restlessly, protesting daily, until the bones are properly reburied. They intend to picket, file complaints, and protest until the bones are removed.

            The main point that needs to be addressed in the Repartition movement is Equality. It would be a completely different story if everyone’s ancestors were getting dug up and shoved in glass cases for everyone to look at. It is important to respect the beliefs of different cultures, and if one culture believes after you are buried you should be able to rest in peace then so be it.  The problem is for the most part the Native Americans have been singled out in this situation; they have been left on the side of the road so everyone can stop and look. For the most part the Museums that choose to display remains of Native Americans are being nothing but inconsiderate, and disrespectful. The Native Americans deserve to be treated no differently then any other group, equality is key in this situation.